onecle

Ex Parte Poulsen et al - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                  
                                          precedent of the Board.                                            

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                      Ex parte DAVID K. POULSEN,                                             
                                SANJIV M. SHAH, PAUL M. PETERSEN,                                            
                             GRANT E. HAAB, AND JAY P. HOEFLINGER                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-1959                                                
                                          Application 10/039,789                                             
                                          Technology Center 2100                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                       Decided: September 11, 2007                                           
                                               ____________                                                  
                Before ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, MAHSHID D. SAADAT,                                               
                and ST. JOHN COURTENAY, III, Administrative Patent Judges.                                   
                SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                                      STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                  
                      Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134(a) from a Final Rejection of                   
                claims 1, 3, 6-8, 10-15, 18, and 20-26, which are all of the claims pending in               
                this application, as claims 2, 4, 5, 9, 16, 17, and 19 have been canceled.  We               
                have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).                                                    




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013