Ex Parte Sullivan - Page 11

               Appeal 2007-1970                                                                             
               Application 10/167,744                                                                       

                      12)  Sullivan identifies IOTEK 7510 as a suitable ionomer for                         
                          use in the cover layers.  The Shore D hardness of IOTEK 7510 is                   
                          35 (Table 9).  IOTEK 7510 is a zinc salt of a terpolymer of                       
                          ethylene, acrylic acid and methyl acrylate (US 6,142,887).                        
                      13)  Sullivan teaches that “[a] cover layer with a particular Shore                   
                          D hardness can be formed using a single ionomer, or more                          
                          commonly, a blend of two or more ionomers” (col. 18, ll. 63-65).                  
                      14)  In Table 2, Sullivan identifies fillers which are particularly                   
                          useful for adjusting flex modulus of the cover layer.                             
                      15)  Sullivan teaches that environmental conditions, such as                          
                          temperature, moisture, atmospheric pressure, etc., effect the                     
                          distance a ball will travel when hit (col. 13, ll. 24-26).                        

                                                 ORDER                                                      
                      The rejection of claims 19, 21-30, and 32-34 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a,                 
               e) as anticipated by Sullivan is reversed.                                                   
                      The rejection of claims 1-10 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a, e) as                           
               anticipated by Sullivan is reversed.                                                         
                      The rejection of claims 1-10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over                 
               Sullivan is affirmed.                                                                        
                      The rejection of claim 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over                    
               Sullivan in view of Maruko is affirmed.                                                      






                                                    11                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013