UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
___________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
___________
Ex parte HONG SUNG SONG and SANG CHANG YUN
___________
Appeal 2007-1975
Application 10/322,770
Technology Center 2600
___________
Decided: October 24, 2007
___________
Before JOSEPH L. DIXON, ROBERT E. NAPPI, and
ST. JOHN COURTENANY III, Administrative Patent Judges.
DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
We REMAND and ORDER APPELLANT TO BRIEF THE ADDITIONAL
MATTER.
Rather than decide this appeal on the merits at this time we choose to
give Appellants a period of one month to address the obviousness-type
double patenting rejection of claims 1-3, 5-9, and 11-13. Claims 1-3, 5-9,
and 11-13 were provisionally rejected under the judicially created doctrine
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013