The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte FRANCESCO PELUSO, PATRICK BALTEAU,
ERIC HENAUT, BARBARA MANDARD,
JEAN-PIERRE HARTMAN, VINCENT HOUWAERT,
GIORGIO CANTONI, and SILVANO SFORACCHI
__________
Appeal 2007-1993
Application 10/277,432
Technology Center 3700
__________
Decided: June 14, 2007
__________
Before DONALD E. ADAMS, DEMETRA J. MILLS, and ERIC GRIMES,
Administrative Patent Judges.
GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to a
container for administering medical solutions. The Examiner has rejected
the claims as obvious. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We
reverse.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013