1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
2 not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4
5 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
6 _____________
7
8 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
9 AND INTERFERENCES
10 _____________
11
12 Ex parte ERIK KRIMM and MICHAEL SIEMERS
13 _____________
14
15 Appeal 2007-2003
16 Application 09/726,589
17 Technology Center 3600
18 ______________
19
20 Decided: August 3, 2007
21 _______________
22
22 Before WILLIAM, F. PATE, III, HUBERT C. LORIN, and STUART S. LEVY,
23
23 Administrative Patent Judges.
24
25
25 PATE, III, Administrative Patent Judge.
26
27
28
29 DECISION ON APPEAL
30
31
32 STATEMENT OF THE CASE
33 This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 4, 8, 20, 24, and 25.
34 Claims 2, 3, 9-19, 21-23, and 26-32 have been canceled. The Examiner has
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013