Ex Parte Barkac et al - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                           
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                     

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                   
                                      Ex parte KAREN A. BARKAC,                                               
                                        DEIRDRE D. RAGAN, and                                                 
                                        KAREN S. RECHENBERG                                                   
                                               ____________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-2062                                                 
                                           Application 10/360,263                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                              
                                               ____________                                                   
                                           Decided:  July 16, 2007                                            
                                               ____________                                                   

                Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHARLES F. WARREN, and                                              
                THOMAS A. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                
                WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the                          
                Primary Examiner’s non-final rejection of claims 1 through 38, which are                      
                the only claims pending in this application.  Although the action appealed                    
                from was a non-final rejection, we have jurisdiction since the claims have                    





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013