Ex Parte Pineau et al - Page 8

                 Appeal 2007-2091                                                                                       
                 Application 10/191,161                                                                                 
                                                   CONCLUSION                                                           
                        To summarize, we have sustained the rejection of claims 1-9 under                               
                 provisional nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting, and we have                                
                 sustained the rejection of claims 1-9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).                                        
                        No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with                              
                 this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).                                                   
                                                     AFFIRMED                                                           


                 clj                                                                                                    
                 WOODCOCK WASHBURN LLP                                                                                  
                 CIRA CENTRE, 12TH FLOOR                                                                                
                 2929 ARCH STREET                                                                                       
                 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19104-2891                                                                            


















                                                           8                                                            

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8

Last modified: September 9, 2013