Ex Parte Yang-Huffman - Page 1



                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is                        
                                    not binding precedent of the Board.                                     

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                  
                                Ex parte SIEW-HONG YANG-HUFFMAN                                             
                                              ____________                                                  
                                            Appeal 2007-2130                                                
                                          Application 10/141,222                                            
                                         Technology Center 2100                                             
                                              ____________                                                  
                                         Decided: October 4, 2007                                           
                                              ____________                                                  

               Before JAMES D. THOMAS, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP,                                               
               and ALLEN R. MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.                                        
               THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This appeal involves claims 1 through 33.  We have jurisdiction under                 
               35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b) and 134(a).                                                                









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013