onecle

Ex Parte Chang et al - Page 1



                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                       
                                            precedent of the Board.                                                

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                      
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                 ____________                                                      
                              Ex parte DANE CHANG, YUNWA W. CHEUNG,                                                
                              CHARLES F. DIEHL, and JOSEPH M. VIHTELIC                                             
                                                 ____________                                                      
                                               Appeal 2007-2154                                                    
                                            Application 10/374,773                                                 
                                            Technology Center 1700                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                      
                                            Decided:  July 31, 2007                                                
                                                 ____________                                                      
                Before CHARLES F. WARREN, PETER F. KRATZ, and                                                      
                LINDA M. GAUDETTE,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                                  
                KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                       This is a decision on an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of                      
                claims 1-14, 16, 17, and 39-41, the only claims that remain pending in this                        
                application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  6 and 134.                             








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013