onecle

Ex Parte Skoog et al - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is                             
                                      not binding precedent of the Board.                                          

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                      
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                 ____________                                                      
                                      Ex parte ANDREW JAY SKOOG,                                                   
                                          JANE ANN MURPHY and                                                      
                                          TIMOTHY RAY LATTIRE                                                      
                                                 ____________                                                      
                                               Appeal 2007-2158                                                    
                                            Application 10/726,357                                                 
                                           Technology Center 1700                                                  
                                                 ____________                                                      
                                             Decided: July 6, 2007                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                      
                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and                                                      
                CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                   
                KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               


                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                       This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-22.  Claim 1 is                      
                illustrative:                                                                                      
                       1.  A method of applying a heat-rejection coating, comprising the                           
                steps of:                                                                                          






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013