Ex Parte Ho - Page 9

                 Appeal 2007-2171                                                                                        
                 Application 09/821,066                                                                                  

                 anyone reading the reference. The Examiner relied on Fig. 8 as the principal                            
                 support for showing that Scheer describes defining a database and searching                             
                 the database. Appellant has never addressed Fig. 8 or the Examiner’s                                    
                 reliance thereon. Arguments which Appellant could have made but chose not                               
                 to make in the Briefs have not been considered and are deemed to be                                     
                 waived. See 37 C.F.R. § 41.37(c)(1)(vii) (2004). Accordingly, we find that                              
                 Scheer at Fig. 8 describes defining a database and searching the database.                              
                        The question then becomes whether, in light of Fig. 8, Scheer                                    
                 anticipates defining the database for indicating functional relationships                               
                 between a plurality of parts and searching the database to identify one or                              
                 more groups of functionally interchangeable parts.  In that regard, the                                 
                 Examiner not only relied on paragraphs 0147 and 0171 but also stated that                               
                        Sheer does disclose an intelligent order fulfillment planning process,                           
                        wherein for each order the distributor has access to data relating to                            
                        equivalent products. An equivalent product can be a product that has                             
                        the same functions and features as a specified product. The                                      
                        equivalency of functions and features is determined as a function of                             
                        product definitions provided by the distributor. This action of                                  
                        substitution utilizes the Intelligent Agent as shown in Figure 2. Also                           
                        shown in Figure 2 is a linkage between the lntelligent Agent and the                             
                        distributor whereby the Intelligent Agent can locate the product                                 
                        definitions. The product definitions is how the Agent Identifies groups                          
                        of functionally interchangeable parts, whereby these definitions are                             
                        stored on the Distributor Collaboratory Server. [FF 7.]                                          
                 This latter discussion was provided in the Final Rejection but Appellant has                            
                 never responded to it. Accordingly, the Examiner’s position that Scheer                                 
                 describes defining functional relationships between a plurality of parts and                            
                 identifying one or more groups of functionally interchangeable parts has not                            
                 been traversed.                                                                                         


                                                           9                                                             

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013