Ex Parte Alexander et al - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is                             
                                       not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                      
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                 ____________                                                      
                                      Ex parte DAVID W. ALEXANDER                                                  
                                                      AND                                                          
                                         DOUGLAS N. MCCLOSKEY                                                      
                                                 ____________                                                      
                                               Appeal 2007-2184                                                    
                                             Application 10/322,838                                                
                                            Technology Center 1700                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                      
                                             Decided: July 30, 2007                                                
                                                 ____________                                                      
                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and CATHERINE                                          
                Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                             
                TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                 

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                       Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s                              
                decision rejecting claims 1 and 2.  Claims 4 and 5, the only other pending                         
                claims, have been withdrawn from consideration.  We have jurisdiction                              
                under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).                                                                            







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013