Ex Parte McIntyre et al - Page 9

              Appeal 2007-2202                                                                                           
              Application 10/608,169                                                                                     

                     directly affects the refractive index of the resonator, thereby determining the                     
                     frequency selected by the circuit.") see sentence bridging pages 8 and 9 in                         
                     Appeal Brief. In this sense, this is exactly what occurs in the device of Ueda,                     
                     where changes in the temperature of the arrayed waveguides 14 affect their                          
                     relative length and positioning (by changes to their refractive index),                             
                     resulting in the center wavelength of each of the output waveguides 16                              
                     coinciding with the desired wavelength (i.e., the "resonance" condition), see                       
                     lines 33-41, col. 4.                                                                                

              Further, the Examiner finds that Ueda’s system of controlling the temperature of                           
              the waveguide to insure that the emitted wavelength is close to the desired                                
              wavelength implies that there is a temperature frequency pair stored and that this                         
              control inherently contains some kind of logic.                                                            
                     As with the rejection based upon Huber, Appellants’ arguments directed to                           
              the rejection based upon Ueda have not persuaded us of error in the Examiner’s                             
              rejection of claim 1, but have persuaded us of error in the Examiner’s rejection of                        
              claim 7.  We concur with the Examiner’s finding that Ueda, teaches that the                                
              waveguides items 14, have a refractive index which changes based upon                                      
              temperature.  (Col. 2, ll. 8-14.)  While, as discussed supra with respect to the                           
              rejection based upon Huber, we concur with the Examiner’s broad interpretation of                          
              the term resonator, we nonetheless find that Ueda meets the more narrow definition                         
              of a device where the refractive index is altered by changes in temperature.  Thus,                        
              we find that Ueda meets Appellants’ claimed resonator.                                                     
                     Contrary to Appellants’ assertions, neither of the independent claims recite a                      
              photonic switch. Thus, whether or not Ueda teaches a photonic switch is irrelevant.                        
                     Further, we find that Ueda teaches that the temperature of the waveguides is                        
              kept constant by a control system, and as such the lengths and the center                                  
              wavelength of the wave guides is maintained constant.  (Col. 4, ll. 33-41.)  From                          

                                                           9                                                             


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013