The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GERALD C. TUSTIN,
JOSEPH R. ZOELLER
and RICHARD D. COLBERG
____________
Appeal 2007-2208
Application 10/650,510
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: August 28, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, PETER F. KRATZ, and JEFFREY T.
SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of
claims 1-8 and 13-15. Claims 9-12 and 16-40, the only other claims that
remain pending in this application, stand withdrawn from further
consideration by the Examiner as drawn to non-elected invention(s). We
have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013