Ex Parte Wood et al - Page 9

                 Appeal 2007-2212                                                                                        
                 Application 10/667,472                                                                                  
                 surface, such particles are stable and have a high bioavailability.                                     
                 Thus the function of the surface modifier of Liversidge is to yield                                     
                 higher bioavailability of the nanoparticle. (Liveridge, col. 3, ll. 1-23.)                              
                 One of ordinary skill in the art would thus also expect Appellants’                                     
                 nanoparticles treated with a surface modifier to provide for a higher                                   
                 bioavailability.  Such expected beneficial results are evidence of                                      
                 obviousness just as unexpected beneficial results are evidence of                                       
                 unobviousness.  See In re Skoner, 517 F.2d 947, 950, 186 USPQ 80,                                       
                 82 (CCPA 1975).  In the present case, one of ordinary skill in the art                                  
                 would have expected surface-modified nanoparticles to provide                                           
                 greater bioavailability of beclamethasone diproprionate in view of the                                  
                 disclosures of Liversidge and Drug.                                                                     
                        The obviousness rejection is affirmed.                                                           

                                                   CONCLUSION                                                            
                        The obviousness rejections are affirmed.                                                         
                        No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with                               
                 this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a).                                                 
                                                     AFFIRMED                                                            

                 lbg                                                                                                     

                 ELAN DRUG DELIVERY, INC.                                                                                
                 C/O FOLEY & LARDNER LLP                                                                                 
                 3000 K STREET, N.W.                                                                                     
                 SUITE 500                                                                                               
                 WASHINGTON DC 20007-5109                                                                                


                                                           9                                                             

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9

Last modified: September 9, 2013