The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOSEPH S. STAM, JON H. BECHTEL,
SPENCER D. REESE, JOHN K. ROBERTS,
WILLIAM L. TONAR,
and G. BRUCE POE
____________
Appeal 2007-2217
Application 11/231,2321
Technology Center 2600
____________
Decided: September 4, 2007
____________
Before ALLEN R. MACDONALD, JAY P. LUCAS,
and JOHN A. JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judges.
JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judge.
1 This application is a continuation of Application Ser. No. 10/326,673, now
U.S. Pat. No. 6,947,577, which is a continuation of Application Ser. No.
09/528,389, filed Mar. 20, 2000, now U.S. Pat. 6,611,610, which is a
continuation-in-part of Application Ser. No. 09/151,487, filed Sept. 11,
1998, now U.S. Pat. 6,255,639, which is a continuation of Application Ser.
No. 08/831,232, filed Apr. 2, 1997, now U.S. Pat. 5,837,994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013