onecle

Ex Parte Augenstein - Page 1



                               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                          
                                        is not binding precedent of the Board.                                     
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                   
                                                  __________                                                       
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                  __________                                                       
                                       Ex parte DON C. AUGENSTEIN                                                  
                                                  __________                                                       
                                               Appeal 2007-2235                                                    
                                            Application 10/138,617                                                 
                                            Technology Center 1700                                                 
                                                  __________                                                       
                                           Decided:  August 20, 2007                                               
                                                  __________                                                       
                Before DONALD E. ADAMS, ERIC GRIMES, and RICHARD M.                                                
                LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                            
                GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               


                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                       This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 involving claims to a method                        
                of removing biodegradable pollutants from contaminated gases.  The                                 
                Examiner has rejected the claims as having new matter and being obvious.                           
                We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).  We reverse the new matter                            
                rejection and affirm the obviousness rejections.                                                   







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013