Ex Parte Rhodes et al - Page 5

               Appeal 2007-2285                                                                             
               Application 10/871,151                                                                       

               would serve to rebut the inference of obviousness established by the applied                 
               prior art.                                                                                   
                      In conclusion, based on the foregoing and the reasons well stated by                  
               the Examiner, the Examiner's decision rejecting the appealed claims is                       
               affirmed.                                                                                    
                      No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with                    
               this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(vi).                                  
                                               AFFIRMED                                                     












               cam                                                                                          





               Michael G. Fletcher                                                                          
               FLETCHER YODER                                                                               
               P. O. Box 692289                                                                             
               Houston, TX   77269-2289                                                                     


                                                     5                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5

Last modified: September 9, 2013