The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JAMES RONALD DAVIS
__________
Appeal 2007-2318
Application 10/947,324
Technology Center 3600
__________
Decided: July 11, 2007
__________
Before DONALD E. ADAMS, ERIC GRIMES, and LORA M. GREEN,
Administrative Patent Judges.
GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to a fishing
lure, which the Examiner has rejected as anticipated and obvious. We have
jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
The Specification discloses a snag-resistant fishing lure comprising a
blade member attached to “a generally conventional jig, comprising a
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013