Ex Parte Saito et al - Page 1



                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                   
                                is not binding precedent of the Board.                              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                     
                                           ____________                                             
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                       
                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                           ____________                                             
                Ex parte KATSUYUKI SAITO, JAR-HOW LEE, and LINDLEY BLAIR                            
                                           ____________                                             
                                         Appeal 2007-2363                                           
                                       Application 10/253,967                                       
                                      Technology Center 1600                                        
                                           ____________                                             
                                    Decided: September 11, 2007                                     
                                           ____________                                             


              Before TONI R. SCHEINER, DONALD E. ADAMS, and LORA M.                                 
              GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                  
              GREEN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                   

                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                            
                    This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the                     
              Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-6 and 8-20.  We have jurisdiction              
              under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).  Claims 1 and 9 are representative of the claims on           
              appeal, and read as follows:                                                          






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013