1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered
2 today is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4
5 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
6 _____________
7
8 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
9 AND INTERFERENCES
10 _____________
11
12 Ex parte STEVEN W. WENTWORTH and ROBERT F. CRANE
13 _____________
14
15 Appeal No. 2007-2378
16 Application No. 10/837,098
17 Technology Center 3600
18 ______________
19
20 Decided: August 28, 2007
21 _______________
22
22 Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, TERRY J. OWENS, and DAVID B. WALKER,
23
23 Administrative Patent Judges.
24
25
25 OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
26
27
28
29 DECISION ON APPEAL
30 The Appellants appeal from a rejection of claims 1-20, which are all of the
31 pending claims.
32 THE INVENTION
33 The Appellants claim a pipe bursting and replacement apparatus and
34 method. Claim 1 is illustrative:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013