onecle

Ex Parte Paranjpe et al - Page 1




                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered                             
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    



                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ___________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ___________                                                   
                          Ex parte AJIT PARANJPE and KANGZHAN ZHANG                                          
                                               ___________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-2384                                                
                                          Application 10/943,424                                             
                                          Technology Center 2800                                             
                                               ___________                                                   
                                       Decided: September 11, 2007                                           
                                               ___________                                                   

                Before JOSEPH L. DIXON, ROBERT E. NAPPI and JOHN A. JEFFERY,                                 
                Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                
                DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          



                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013