Ex Parte Brill et al - Page 1





            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent              
                                               of the Board.                                                 

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ___________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ___________                                                   
                    Ex parte LAWRENCE D. BRILL and TOMAZ DOPICO VARELA                                       
                                               ___________                                                   
                                           Appeal No. 2007-2426                                              
                                        Application No. 11/058,146                                           
                                          Technology Center 3600                                             
                                               ___________                                                   
                                       Decided: September 13, 2007                                           
                                               ___________                                                   
            Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, TERRY J. OWENS and DAVID B. WALKER,                                 
            Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                    
            OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                              


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  

                   The Appellants appeal from a rejection of claims 1-16 and 18-23.  Claim 17                
            has been canceled.                                                                               







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013