Ex Parte Kedem - Page 2

                 Appeal 2007-2450                                                                                     
                 Application 10/634,871                                                                               
                 13. A system board comprising:                                                                       
                 (a) a connector that includes:                                                                       
                        (i) a first port situated at an exterior edge of the system board and                         
                        facing outward from said exterior edge, and                                                   
                        (ii) a second port, facing inward to an interior of the system board;                         
                        and                                                                                           
                 (b) a peripheral device operationally connected to said inward-facing                                
                 port.                                                                                                
                        The prior art reference of record relied upon by the Examiner in                              
                 rejecting the appealed claims is:                                                                    
                 Meng US 6,231,399 B1 May 15, 2001                                                                    
                        Claims 3, 4, 8 through 10, 13, 16, and 18 through 22 stand rejected                           
                 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Meng.                                            
                        We refer to the Examiner's Answer (mailed May 4, 2006) and to                                 
                 Appellant's Brief (filed March 9, 2006) for the respective arguments.                                

                                           SUMMARY OF DECISION                                                        
                        As a consequence of our review, we will reverse the obviousness                               
                 rejection of claim 4 and affirm the obviousness rejection of claims 3, 8                             
                 through 10, 13, 16, and 18 through 22.                                                               

                                                     OPINION                                                          
                        The Examiner asserts (Answer 3) that Meng's connector 10 with port                            
                 14 facing in the opposite direction to port 16 satisfies all of the limitations of                   
                 independent claim 13 except for the first port being at an exterior edge of the                      


                                                          2                                                           

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013