Ex Parte Ludwig - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-2463                                                                              
                Application 10/403,555                                                                        
                                                                                                             
                                       STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                  
                      Appellant invented a rotor structure for an electric motor that ensures                 
                that a bandage wrapped around the rotor core assembly is securely attached.                   
                In particular, a securing ring is disposed radially over the edge of the                      
                bandage to substantially extend flush with the bandage.1  Claim 1 is                          
                illustrative with the key limitation in dispute emphasized:                                   
                      1.  A rotor structure for an electric motor, comprising:                                
                      a cylindrical rotor core assembly having an end surface face;                           
                      a plurality of permanent magnets disposed on an outer circumference                     
                      of the rotor core assembly;                                                             
                      a bandage wrapped around the rotor core assembly to secure the                          
                permanent magnets in place, said bandage having a bandage edge arranged                       
                in proximity of the end surface of the rotor core assembly; and                               
                      a securing ring disposed radially over the bandage edge such as to                      
                substantially extend flush with the bandage and to hold the bandage against                   
                the rotor core assembly.                                                                      

                      The Examiner relies on the following prior art references to show                       
                unpatentability:                                                                              
                Kojima                    JP (Hei) 5-207689 A1       Aug. 13, 1993                            
                Zigler                    US 5,345,669               Sep. 13, 1994                            

                   1. Claims 1-4, 6, 7, and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                      
                      being anticipated by Kojima.                                                            


                                                                                                             
                1 See generally Specification ¶¶ 0007-0008.                                                   

                                                      2                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013