Ex Parte Farr et al - Page 8


                  Appeal 2007-2488                                                                                         
                  Application 10/081,483                                                                                   

             1            of the dip tube enabling gas from the headspace to be                                            
             2            entrained in fluid being dispensed through the dip tube when                                     
             3            the valve is open.                                                                               
             4                                                                                                             
             5               14.  A beverage product according to claim 13, wherein the                                    
             6            quantity of gas expelled from the container when the valve is                                    
             7            opened is greater than 0.5 cubic centimeters per 1 cubic                                         
             8            centimeter of liquid beverage when measured at atmospheric                                       
             9            pressure and 20ēC.                                                                               
           10                                                                                                              
           11        22.  The Examiner found, and Farr does not contest, that Berg teaches                                 
           12            “that the conventional effervescent beverage is 1 volume of gas per                               
           13            volume of liquid.”  (Answer at 5-6).                                                              
           14                                             Frutin II                                                        
           15        23.  Claims 17 and 184 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                                 
           16            unpatentable over Frutin I as applied to claims 1, 3, 5-8, 15, and 16                             
           17            and further in view of Frutin II.  (Answer at 6-7).                                               
           18        24.  Claims 17 is representative and is as follows:                                                   
           19                A beverage product according to claim 1 wherein the                                           
           20             sparingly soluble effervescence inducing gas is contained in a                                   
           21             widget that releases its contents into the container when the                                    
           22             valve is opened.                                                                                 







                                                                                                                          
                  4  The claims are argued together as to this rejection.                                                  

                                                            8                                                              

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013