onecle

Ex Parte Eisen - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding               
                                          precedent of the Board.                                         

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                         
                                              ____________                                                
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                          
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                
                                              ____________                                                
                                       Ex parte JEFFREY N. EISEN                                          
                                              ____________                                                
                                             Appeal 2007-2514                                             
                                          Application 10/034,255                                          
                                          Technology Center 2100                                          
                                              ____________                                                
                                       Decided: September 21, 2007                                        
                                              ____________                                                
               Before JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, and ST. JOHN                               
               COURTENAY, III, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              
               GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                               

                                       STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                              
                     Eisen (Appellant) appeals under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the Examiner's                  
               Final Rejection of claims 1 through 25, which are all of the claims pending                
               in this application.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).                         
                     Appellant's invention relates to a method for enabling a user to select              
               documents from a summary view of documents and to create a list of the                     




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013