Ex Parte Faye et al - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                  
                                          precedent of the Board.                                            

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                Ex parte  IAN FAYE, FRANK BRENNER,                                           
                                 THANH-HUNG NGUYEN-SCHAEFER,                                                 
                              RAINER SALIGER, and THOMAS HEBNER                                              
                                               ____________                                                  
                                            Appeal  2007-2553                                                
                                          Application 10/367,347                                             
                                         Technology Center  1700                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                          Decided:  July 31, 2007                                            
                                               ____________                                                  

                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and                                                
                JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              
                WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge                                                           


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                         
                Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-3 and 15.  Claims 4-14 and                    
                16 are the only other claims pending in this application and stand objected to               





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013