The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is
not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAE-HO CHOO,
BAEK-KYUN AND HYUNG-WOO NAM
____________
Appeal 2007-2554
Application 10/667,515
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: August 21, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and PETER F.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 8-13. Claim 8 is
illustrative:
8. An apparatus for cutting a non-metallic substrate, comprising:
a first laser beam generating means that generates a first laser beam
for breaking molecular bonds of the non-metallic substrate material so as to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013