onecle

Ex Parte Dawson - Page 1



                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is                        
                                    not binding precedent of the Board.                                      

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                      Ex parte TIMOTHY DAWSON                                                
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-2585                                                
                                          Application 09/917,192                                             
                                         Technology Center 3600                                              
                                               ____________                                                  
                                         Decided: August 28, 2007                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, PETER F. KRATZ, and                                                 
                CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
                KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-14 and 23-33.                   
                Claim 1 is illustrative:                                                                     
                      1.  A door module for covering a surface cut-out recess in an inside                   
                panel of a vehicle door, the door module comprising:                                         
                      a substantially rigid portion of long glass fiber reinforced plastic; and              






Page:  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013