onecle

Ex Parte Ziech et al - Page 1



                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                   
                         Ex parte JAMES ZIECH and MICHAEL CHAMBERLIN                                          
                                               ____________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-2613                                                 
                                           Application 10/660,239                                             
                                          Technology Center 3600                                              
                                               ____________                                                   
                                          Decided: August 31, 2007                                            
                                               ____________                                                   
                Before WILLIAM F. PATE III, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, and                                          
                HUBERT C. LORIN,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                               
                WILLIAM F. PATE III, Administrative Patent Judge.                                             
                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  

                                          STATEMENT OF CASE                                                   

                      This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-12, 14, 18, and                  
                20. The Examiner withdrew the rejections of claims 13 and 19 in the                           
                Answer. They along with claims 15-17, 21, and 22 stand objected to.  These                    
                are all the claims in the application.                                                        
                    We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  6 and 134.                  
                    The claimed subject matter is directed to a suspension for a vehicle.                     






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013