Ex Parte Mizutani - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-2640                                                                              
                Application 09/933,517                                                                        
                Production In Toyama Bay Japan,” published 1994), Nomura (English                             
                translation of “Treatment of Atopy Skin Inflammation by Deep Sea Water,”                      
                published 1995), and Miyamato (English translation of “High Degree of                         
                Application for Deep Sea Water In Fishing Ports,” published 1999);                            
                      2) Claims 11-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious                      
                over Meilahn in view of Iseki, Nomura, and Miyamato, and further in view                      
                of Mougin (US 4,166,363, issued Sep. 4, 1979);                                                
                      3) Claim 14 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over                    
                Meilahn in view of Iseki, Nomura, and Miyamato, and further in view of                        
                Sibinski (US 2,641,221, issued Jun. 9, 1953);                                                 
                      4) Claims 15, 17, and 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                     
                obvious over Meilahn in view of Iseki, Nomura, and Miyamato, and further                      
                in view of Mougin and Sibinski;                                                               
                      5) Claim 20 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over                    
                Meilahn in view of Iseki, Nomura, and Miyamato, and further in view of                        
                Puncochar (US 3,571,819, issued Mar. 23, 1971);                                               
                      6) Claim 21 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over                    
                Meilahn in view of Iseki, Nomura, and Miyamato, and further in view of                        
                Mougin, Sibinski, and Puncochar;                                                              
                      7) Claims 22 and 24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                          
                obvious over Meilahn in view of Iseki, Nomura, and Miyamato, and further                      
                in view of O’Sullivan (US 5,929,538, issued Jul. 27, 1999);                                   
                      8) Claims 23 and 25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                          
                obvious over Meilahn in view of Iseki, Nomura, and Miyamato, and further                      
                in view of Mougin, Sibinski, Puncochar, and O’Sullivan;                                       



                                                      2                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013