The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte
DAVID L. DELEEUW, ROGER V. LEE, CHARLES F. FRITTER,
DENNIS B. JENKINS, ANANTH N. SHENOY,
and RAMESH HERNLEM
__________
Appeal 2007-2814
Application 10/215,174
Technology Center 3600
__________
Decided: September 26, 2007
__________
Before DEMETRA J. MILLS, ERIC GRIMES, and RICHARD M.
LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to a
particulate litter composition. The Examiner has rejected the claims as
obvious. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We reverse.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013