Ex Parte Shannon - Page 2

                 Appeal 2007-2862                                                                                      
                 Application 10/955,533                                                                                
                        The invention relates to a wiping product such as facial tissue, bath                          
                 tissue and paper towels.  (Br. 2; claim 21).  Claim 1 is illustrative of the                          
                 invention and is reproduced below:                                                                    
                        1. A wiping product comprising a non-woven fibrous sheet                                       
                        containing a deliquescent material and a friction reduction compound.                          
                        The Examiner relies on the following prior art references to show                              
                 unpatentability:                                                                                      
                 Kennedy          US 4,390,438           Jun. 28, 1983                                                 
                 Viazmensky          US 5,009,747           Apr. 23, 1991                                              
                 Nielsen          US 5,167,764           Dec. 1, 1992                                                  
                 Kato           US 5,814,568           Sep. 29, 1998                                                   

                        The Examiner made the following rejections:                                                    
                        1.  Claims 1-14 and 17-21 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over                           
                 Kato in view of Nielsen and Kennedy.                                                                  
                        2.  Claim 23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Kato in view                           
                 of Nielsen and Kennedy and further in view of Viazmensky.                                             

                                                 BACKGROUND                                                            
                        The Examiner finds that Kato discloses the invention as claimed with                           
                 the exception of a polyethylene oxide friction reduction compound.                                    
                 (Answer 3-4).  The Examiner further finds that Nielson discloses the                                  
                 addition of high molecular weight polyethylene oxide in the manufacture of                            
                 nonwoven/paper sheets to provide excellent slip characteristics and aid in                            
                 deterring the formation of clumps, tangles and bundles.  (Answer 4).  The                             
                 Examiner contends that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill                            
                 in the art at the time of the invention to add high molecular weight                                  


                                                          2                                                            

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013