onecle

Ex Parte Ulrich et al - Page 1




                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                  
                          Ex parte MARK A. ULRICH and GREGORY D. POPP                                       
                                              ____________                                                  
                                            Appeal 2007-2869                                                
                                          Application 10/286,535                                            
                                         Technology Center 3700                                             
                                              ____________                                                  
                                        Decided: October 18, 2007                                           
                                              ____________                                                  
            Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, JENNIFER D. BAHR and LINDA E. HORNER,                              
            Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                   
            HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 

                                      STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                 
                   Appellants seek our review under 35 U.S.C.  134 of the Examiner’s final                 
            rejection of claims 1, 3-7, 10-27, and 36-43, all the claims currently pending in the           
            application.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b) (2002).                               
                                       SUMMARY OF DECISION                                                  
                   We AFFIRM.                                                                               






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013