Ex Parte Green - Page 1





         1                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                    
         2                         today is not binding precedent of the Board.                                        
         3                                                                                                             
         4                                                                                                             
         5                UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                    
         6                                        _____________                                                        
         7                                                                                                             
         8                      BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
         9                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
        10                                        _____________                                                        
        11                                                                                                             
        12                                  Ex parte KEVIN J. GREEN                                                    
        13                                        _____________                                                        
        14                                                                                                             
        15                                    Appeal No. 2007-2875                                                     
        16                                  Application No. 10/447,732                                                 
        17                                   Technology Center 3700                                                    
        18                                       ______________                                                        
        19                                                                                                             
        20                                 Decided: September 19, 2007                                                 
        21                                       _______________                                                       
        22                                                                                                             
        22 Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, TERRY J. OWENS, and JOSEPH A.                                                  
        23                                                                                                             
        23 FISCHETTI, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                    
        24                                                                                                             
        25                                                                                                             
        25 PATE, III, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                     
        26                                                                                                             
        27                                                                                                             
        28                                                                                                             
        29                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
        30                                                                                                             
        31                                                                                                             
        32                                STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                        
        33                                                                                                             
        34          This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-9 and 16-20.  Claims                        
        35    10-15 stand withdrawn from consideration.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.                          
        36     134 and 6.                                                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013