Ex Parte Harwell et al - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                           
                                    is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                   
                                    Ex parte MICHAEL G. HARWELL,                                              
                                 DALE L. HANER, and LEISA A. RYAN                                             
                                               ____________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-2967                                                 
                                           Application 10/274,827                                             
                                          Technology Center 1600                                              
                                               ____________                                                   
                                        Decided: September 25, 2007                                           
                                               ____________                                                   
                Before TONI R. SCHEINER, DONALD E. ADAMS, and DEMETRA J.                                      
                MILLS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                          
                MILLS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involves claims 1-5 and 7-21, the                     
                only claims pending in this application.  We have jurisdiction under 35                       
                U.S.C. § 6(b).                                                                                








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013