onecle

Ex Parte Andres - Page 1



                                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered                              
                                  today is not binding precedent of the Board.                                     
                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                _____________                                                      
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                _____________                                                      
                                        Ex parte ROBERT M. ANDRES                                                  
                                                _____________                                                      
                                               Appeal 2007-2980                                                    
                                            Application 10/396,649                                                 
                                               Technology Center                                                   
                                                 ____________                                                      
                                           Decided: October 31, 2007                                               
                                               _______________                                                     
                Before TERRY J. OWENS, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, and                                                    
                ANTON W. FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                    
                OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                


                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                       The Appellant appeals from a rejection of claims 1-8, 11-18 and 21-                         
                25, which are all of the pending claims.                                                           
                                               THE INVENTION                                                       
                       The Appellant claims a method for sensitizing an air bag deployment                         
                threshold.  Claim 1 is illustrative:                                                               







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013