UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte DANIEL SCHREIBER,VESELIN SKENDZIC, E. FRED BESTEL,
PAUL N. STOVING, and RICHARD A. HARTHUN.
_____________
Appeal 2007-3126
Application 10/359,275
Technology Center 2800
______________
Decided: October 30, 2007
_______________
Before JOHN C. MARTIN, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, and JOHN A.
JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judges.
MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
This is an appeal from the Examiner’s Final Rejection of claims 1-10 and
21-23 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 1 and of claims 1-8, 10, and 21-23 under § 103(a).
Dependent claim 9 has been indicated to be allowable if rewritten in independent
form (Answer 2).
We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013