onecle

Ex Parte Schreiber et al - Page 1





                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                           
                                             _____________                                                 
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                             _____________                                                 
               Ex parte DANIEL SCHREIBER,VESELIN SKENDZIC, E. FRED BESTEL,                                 
                          PAUL N. STOVING, and RICHARD A. HARTHUN.                                         
            _____________                                                                                  
                                            Appeal 2007-3126                                               
                                         Application 10/359,275                                            
                                         Technology Center 2800                                            
                                            ______________                                                 
                                        Decided: October 30, 2007                                          
                                            _______________                                                

            Before JOHN C. MARTIN, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, and JOHN A.                                      
            JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                         
            MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           


                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                                      STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                
                  This is an appeal from the Examiner’s Final Rejection of claims 1-10 and                 
            21-23 under 35 U.S.C.  112,  1 and of claims 1-8, 10, and 21-23 under  103(a).              
            Dependent claim 9 has been indicated to be allowable if rewritten in independent               
            form (Answer 2).                                                                               
                  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).                                             




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013