The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TOM TANG, JOHN NANTZ,
RIAD GHABRA, THOMAS LEMENSE, and
JAN SUPRONOWICZ
____________
Appeal 2007-3131
Application 10/716,1211
Technology Center 2600
____________
Decided: July 31, 2007
____________
Before RICHARD E. SCHAFER, JAMESON LEE, and
RICHARD TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
A. Statement of the Case
This is a decision on appeal by Applicants under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a)
from a rejection of claims 1-20 in Application 10/716,121. We have
jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
1 Filed November 18, 2003. The real party in interest is Lear Corporation.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013