onecle

Ex Parte Shermer et al - Page 1



                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is                        
                                    not binding precedent of the Board.                                     

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                  
                                      Ex parte JASON C. SHERMER                                             
                                     AND MATTHEW J. HOLLAND                                                 
                                              ____________                                                  
                                            Appeal 2007-3147                                                
                                          Application 10/072,435                                            
                                         Technology Center 1700                                             
                                              ____________                                                  
                                       Decided: September 14, 2007                                          
                                              ____________                                                  
               Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, THOMAS A WALTZ, and PETER F.                                       
               KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                         
               WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the                        
               Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-11 and 13-23, which are the                   
               only claims pending in this application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to                   
               35 U.S.C.  6(b).                                                                            
                      According to Appellants, the invention is directed a universal abrasive               
               sheet comprising a sheet material having an abrasive material disposed on a                  




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013