The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte OLLE GUNNAR HEINONEN, and
NURUL AMIN
____________
Appeal 2007-3202
Application 10/145,9871
Technology Center 2600
____________
Decided: July 31, 2007
____________
Before JAMESON LEE, RICHARD TORCZON, and MICHAEL P.
TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
A. Statement of the Case
This is a decision on appeal by Applicants under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a)
from a rejection of claims 1-5, 7-16, and 31-40 in Application 10/145,987.
We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
1 35 U.S.C. § 371(c) date: May 14, 2002. The real party in interest is
Seagate Technology LLC.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013