Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex Parte Tanaka et al - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2007 > Ex Parte Tanaka et al - Page 1

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                           Ex parte SHIGEKI TANAKA and SHIGEKI TAMAI                                         
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-3283                                                
                                          Application 10/271,594                                             
                                          Technology Center 2600                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                        Decided: October 30, 2007                                            
                                               ____________                                                  


                Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, LEE E. BARRETT, and ROBERT E.                                    
                NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                         
                HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                       



                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b) and 134 from the final                       
                rejection of claims 1, 3, 5, and 8 to 10.                                                    
                      Claim 1 is representative of the claimed invention, and it reads as                    
                follows:                                                                                     
                      1. A method of driving a liquid crystal panel including a plurality of                 
                pixels arranged in a matrix form, the plurality of pixels each including a pair              





Page:  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007