Ex Parte Ruby et al - Page 2

               Appeal 2007-3322                                                                             
               Application 09/947,094                                                                       
                                      References Relied on by the Examiner                                  
               Rand                      U.S. Patent 6,521,879 B1        Feb. 18, 2003                      
               Hochstein                 U.S. Patent 5,783,909           Jul. 21, 1998                      
               Blalock                   U.S. Patent 6,344,641 B1        Feb. 5, 2002                       
                                         The Rejection on Appeal                                            
                      The Examiner rejected claims 1-4, 8, 11-15, and 31 under 35 U.S.C. §                  
               103 as unpatentable over Rand.                                                               
                      The Examiner rejected claims 6, 9, 10, 18, 20-24, 26-28, and 30 under                 
               35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Rand and Blalock.                                       
                      The Examiner rejected claim 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable                   
               over Rand and Hochstein.                                                                     
                      The Examiner rejected claim 29 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                               
               unpatentable over Rand, Blalock, and Hochstein.                                              
                      The Examiner rejected claims 1-4, 7, 8, 11-15, and 31 under 35                        
               U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Hochstein.                                                 
                      The Examiner rejected claims 6, 9, 10, 18, 20-24, and 26-30 under 35                  
               U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Hochstein and Blalock.                                     
               B.     Issue                                                                                 
                      Has the Applicant shown error in the rejection of claims 1-4, 6-15, 18,               
               20-24, and 26-31?                                                                            
               C.     Summary of the Decision                                                               
                      The Applicant has not shown error in the rejection of claims 1-4, 6-15,               
               18, 20-24, and 26-30, but has shown error in the rejection of claim 31.                      



                                                     2                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013