The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is
not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte NORIHIKO SAITO and
MASAAKI KONDO
____________
Appeal 2007-3378
Application 10/715,458
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: August 31, 2007
____________
Before CHARLES F. WARREN, PETER F. KRATZ, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s
decision rejecting claims 1-19. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We AFFIRM.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013