The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KIRKLAND W. VOGT, JASON L. KREIDER,
and ROBERT J. GOULET
____________
Appeal 2007-3387
Application 10/307,027
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: September 24, 2007
____________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHUNG K. PAK,
and LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Examiner's refusal to allow claims 1 through 3, 5, 7 through 9, and 11.
Claims 6 and 12, the other claims pending in the above-identified
application, stand withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-
elected invention. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013