Ex Parte Vogt et al - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                          
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                         Ex parte KIRKLAND W. VOGT, JASON L. KREIDER,                                        
                                         and ROBERT J. GOULET                                                
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-3387                                                
                                          Application 10/307,027                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                       Decided:  September 24, 2007                                          
                                               ____________                                                  
                Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHUNG K. PAK,                                                      
                and LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                         
                PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the                         
                Examiner's refusal to allow claims 1 through 3, 5, 7 through 9, and 11.                      
                Claims 6 and 12, the other claims pending in the above-identified                            
                application, stand withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-                  
                elected invention.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  6.                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013