The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is
not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HIROSHI YOSHIZAWA,
TAKAYUKI SHIRANE,
YOSHIAKI NITTA, and
KAZUHIRO OKAMURA
____________
Appeal 2007-3414
Application 10/194,032
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: October 4, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and
LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s
decision rejecting claims 18-27, 30, 31, and 34-41. We have jurisdiction
under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013