Ex Parte Thorpe et al - Page 1



                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is                          
                                     not binding precedent of the Board.                                       

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                               ____________                                                    
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                    
                                          Ex parte ALAN THORPE                                                 
                                                     and                                                       
                                         WALLACE H. KUNERTH                                                    
                                               ____________                                                    
                                              Appeal 2007-3418                                                 
                                           Application 11/032,390                                              
                                          Technology Center 1700                                               
                                               ____________                                                    
                                          Decided: August 29, 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                    
                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and                                                  
                CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                               
                WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            


                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the                           
                Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 24 through 30.  The remaining                     
                claims pending in this application are claims 1-23, which stand withdrawn                      
                from consideration as directed to a non-elected invention (Br. 2).  We have                    
                jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  6(b).                                                     




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013