onecle

Ex Parte Werthman et al - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                  
                                          precedent of the Board.                                            

                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                         
                                              __________________                                             
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                           
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                
                                              __________________                                             
                        Ex parte PAUL A. WERTHMAN, GARY E. SCHRADER,                                         
                                    PETER A. WALTZ, ALAN BECK                                                
                                         and MICHAEL RZASA                                                   
                                              __________________                                             
                                             Appeal 2007-3462                                                
                                          Application 11/172,2231                                            
                                          Technology Center 2800                                             
                                               ________________                                              
                                            Decided: August 23, 2007                                         
                                               ________________                                              
                Before RICHARD TORCZON, SALLY GARDNER LANE, and SALLY C.                                     
                MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                        
                MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         
                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
           1          A.  Statement of the Case                                                              
           2          Applicants appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from a final rejection of                      
           3    claims 1-5, 7-9, 12-15, 17 and 19-21.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.                  
           4     6(b).                                                                                      
                                                                                                            
                1   Application for patent filed 29 June 2005.  The real party in interest is                




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013