onecle

Ex Parte Blatchford et al - Page 1



                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered                             
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                      Ex parte TODD A. BLATCHFORD, STEVEN B. HEINECKE,                                       
                          DONALD H. LUCAST, and DONALD G. PETERSON                                           
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-3575                                                
                                          Application 10/233,698                                             
                                          Technology Center 1600                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                         Decided: August 27, 2007                                            
                                               ____________                                                  


                Before DONALD E. ADAMS, LORA M. GREEN and RICHARD M.                                         
                LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                      
                GREEN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the                            
                Examiner’s final rejection of claims 65-83.  We have jurisdiction under                      
                35 U.S.C.  6(b).  Claims 65, 66, 77, and 78 are representative of the claims                
                on appeal, and read as follows:                                                              





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013